Skip to main content

My take on the Schedule of Prices (SoP) for Mechanical Services.

Salam, 

My take on the Schedule of Prices (SoP) for Mechanical Services.

1. You don’t have to start from scratch. You can use the previous job’s SoP and modify accordingly, especially if your typing style is ‘patuk ayam’ (non-Malaysians, please Google that).

2. Try to make time to prepare the SoP yourself, especially when you’re the designer. Some of us may ask our typist to type it out based on our draft. Personally, I don’t like that as I’m of the opinion that it’s a technical document and should be prepared by technical people. Maybe because I can type without looking at the keyboard (haha).

2. Normally, we’ll start of the SoP with the Preliminaries section.

What's in it?

- Items like Shop Drawings, As-built Drawings, Operations and Maintenance Manual.

- Items like Performance Bond, wait... Performance Bond shouldn't be in the Prelims. It's the Nominated Sub-Contractor's responsibility to issue a PB to the Main Contractor. The Main Contractor also issues a PB to the Client. Don't know what PB is? Please read PAM 2006 or 2018 or Google. 

- Items like Insurance, Site Management. Site Management means that the NSC must have one Project Manager, one or even two supervisors. The rest? That would be his workers who the NSC sub-lets to. Some of you may have a question about sub-letting, I understand. In this practice, it's the NSC's own sub-contractors, not another Plumbing or ACMV or Fire or Electrical Installation Company (meaning a sub-contractor). To put a Project Manager and two supervisors (depending on the size of the project), the Client must pay. 

For insurance, if you're using PAM 2006 or 2018, please read the clauses on insurance. I'm not sure about JKR's (seldom use them), but you may ask engineers who are familiar with this or read the JKR 203N.

- Cost of Tender Document? No. This one the NSC cannot claim from the Client. 

- Cost of Sub-Contract Document? No. The Consultant prepares the Sub-Contract Document so he bills the Client as part of the litography charges. 

Some engineers would like to put in item for Testing and Commissioning and Service and Maintenance in Prelims. It's not wrong. My preference is to have the T&C and S&M items in each section of the SoP.

For example, the SoP has 3 sections - namely Cold Water, Sanitary and Rainwater Harvesting. So each section will have T&C and S&M at the end of each sections. 

3. You must remember that the M&E contract is of a lump-sum type. So, your tender drawings and specifications takes precedence over the SoP. You must ensure that there is a statement in your Tender Document which states that your drawings and specs take precedence. 

You can have that statement in the Supplementary Conditions of Contract. Should the Contractor try to argue with you that the SoP should take precedence, you can point out to him the statement and ask him why he didn’t study the drawings and specs properly when he was preparing his bid.

 However, do ensure that you have the section in your SoP called “Other Items” so that whatever that you might miss in your SoP and those things you missed are in the drawings and specs, the Contractor might pick them up and write them down in “Other Items”. How to draft this “Other Items” thing? Well, later I’ll put up a sample of an SoP I’ve prepared.

4. Study the drawings carefully. Since you’re not putting in any quantities, except maybe for large equipment such as chillers, tanks or pumps (just to name a few), you can use the schematics as your guide and list down and describe briefly the items that you see on your schematics.

5. For a multi-storey building, it’s good to arrange the schedule according to the floors, for example :-

Supply, deliver and install….. c/w the following, as per drawings and/or specifications :-

a) Valves

b) Fittings

c) Hangers and supports

d)….

e)….

f)….

For the following floors :-

1) Basement 2

2) Basement 1

3) Lower Ground Floor

4) Ground Floor

5)…..

6)……

Why? Because that will help to ease the progress claim assessment process by your site staff later. Remember that your SoP will be the basis for the Sub-Contractor to produce his Progress Claim.

6) Avoid repetitions as much as possible. For example, if your drawings (either schematic or floor plan) has already stated the dimensions and the capacity of your FRP tank, do not repeat the dimensions and the capacity in your SoP. Let there be only ONE source of reference. The problem with having too many references is that you may change your drawing but you forgot to change the description in your SoP. No doubt that the drawings take precedence, right? But save yourself from that hassle. If the Sub-Contractor wants to price the tank, let him look for the dimensions and the capacity of the tank – or any other equipment – on the drawings.

7) If possible, for Testing and Commissioning and Service and Maintenance during DLP, have a separate item for those. Avoid lumping T&C and S&M in the sentence, i.e “Supply, deliver and install…… complete with T&C and S&M during DLP…” Again, it’s about Progress Claim assessment, among other reasons.

8) If your tanks are of RC, remember that you’re not quantifying the structure of the tank, ok? But you have lots of other stuffs that you want your plumbing contractor to install there so list them out in your SoP based on your Tank Details drawings, eg access hatch, puddle collar, vortex inhibitor, and those pipes you need to put in before the casting of the tank.

9) It’s good to state items such as builders work in connection, especially when you’re working on retrofit jobs – dealing with existing buildings – example – coring and making good of floor slabs. Believe me, there used to be arguments between the Structure and M&E on this item. To me, I’d rather have the Mechanical Contractor price those items, especially if I didn’t produce any opening drawings for the Structure Engineer to pick up the required openings (pasal tak sempat atau lupa - alasan standard).

Since this looks like becoming a thesis, I’d better stop here. InshaAllah, I’ll put up a sample of the SoP which I’ve prepared and try my best to answer your questions.

I’m pretty sure that I’ve might have missed some important stuffs here so please share your experience or ideas for the benefit of everyone reading this posting ya?

Allah SWT knows best.

May we all be guided by Allah SWT, insha Allah. Amin.

Thank you for reading.

Peace,

Wassalam,

FbI

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Professional Engineer - Becoming a PE-PC is optional

                                                                                                  بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيْم Salam Syawal, My mistakes in this posting is of my own.  Allah SWT is Perfection. I only have the best of intentions. The opinion put forth here is personal.  All that are beneficial comes only from Allah SWT.  SubhanAllah Walhamdulillah.  in my humble opinion, a Professional Engineer in Mechanical Engineering is an engineer who could be a professional engineer in the many branches of Mechanical Engineering - from building services to power generation plant.  so to cut to the chase, Mechanical Engineers in the building services consultancy who...

The Professional Engineer - The Hexagon

                                   بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيْم S alam Syawal, My mistakes in this posting is of my own.  Allah SWT is Perfection. I only have the best of intentions. The opinion put forth here is personal.  All that are beneficial comes only from Allah SWT.  SubhanAllah Walhamdulillah.  For submitting persons defined under the latest amendment of the SBDA 1974, the submitting engineer shall be a Professional Engineer with Practicing Certificate (PE-PC). After the amendment 2015 of the REA came into effect.  The copy i'm referring to is the edition As of 10th March 2020 (which i believe is the most current - as far as the amendments under Act 133), where it says "qualified person" means a Professional Architect, Professional Engineer or building draughtman registered under any written law relating to the registration thereof i'm hopin...

Safety Factor Might Not Be Safe - Story of the Flow, Head and Running Amps

Safety Factor Might Not Be Safe Salam, I know all of you Mechys and Civils here have seen this chart. It tells you a bunch of stuff. One of the most important stuff would be how flow, Q increases with the lowering of the head, H, and vice versa along the pump curve. The power input to the pump, P2 increases with the increase in Q. If you oversize the H in the design, the actual H during operation will be lower than the H at the red dot there. Oversizing H is caused the fear that your pressure may be inadequate. So you put in a high safety factor (SF) to total pipe length (straight pipe length + equivalent length), static head difference and residual pressure. But in actual operation, the H is much lower, (one of the reasons being that the pipe is new) which causes the Q to increase (follow the pump curve line to the right). See what happens to the power curve in the chart below the pump curve. There is an increase in P2. In the post earlier, what happened during T&C was...